another word for things that shouldnt get into cuz its fun

Students shouldn’t be forced into the role of a professional athlete.Ĭollege is a time to learn, and whether a student wants to be an accountant or a professional athlete, they are not a professional when still in school. In the real world, any business running in the red is very likely not hiring, and there is nothing to stay that a college athletic team that pays its players would operate any differently. What this study found was that only 23 of the 228 Division I schools were running their programs in the black, which would technically mean that only 23 of the 228 schools really had the money to pay a college athlete. An analysis was done in 2013 concerning the financial stability of public school Division I athletic departments.

There is also the fact that not every college could afford the players they want to recruit. What if a school pays a player a high wage, and they end up getting hurt? However, the questions arise of how the value of a player will be determined and what happens if an athlete is “hired” at a small rate of pay, and then vastly improves over the season. The payment would vary depending on the local market and the deal that each athlete has with the school. This would allow supply and demand to come into play, and a school would be able to pay an individual player based on the revenue that comes in due to their talents. First, some people believe that these people should all be paid based on an open market system. When the topic of paying college athletes comes up, there are two trains of thought. There is no fair way to allocate funds to student athletes. However, today, the deficit for the Rutgers athletic department tops $36 million, which is the same as losing $1 every second for an entire year. The goal of this expansion was no different than the goal of Auburn…to bring more money into the program. Approximately six years ago, Rutgers University made a big purchase: an expansion to the football stadium that cost $102 million.

You can also look at numbers across the board for some of the top schools in the nation and see that these purchases are not the best investments. However, what these people do not realize is that the Auburn athletic department posted a $17 million deficit in 2014 and this screen was the equivalent of a ‘Hail Mary’ pass to try to bring more money into the program.Īuburn is not alone in this. On the surface, this seems like a valid statement. Now, people who believe college athletes should be paid see this cost and immediately say, if Auburn can spend this much on a screen, they certainly can spend money on paying their athletes.

Another word for things that shouldnt get into cuz its fun